People v. Taylor

188 A.D.2d 738, 591 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13782
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 164 A.D.2d 922

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered June 22, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that his sentence of 4 Vi to 9 years’ imprisonment was harsh and excessive. We disagree. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed. In [739]*739addition, as a part of the plea arrangement various other pending charges were dropped. Given these circumstances, and the fact that the sentence was the most lenient sentence possible under the terms of the plea bargain, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v Mackey, 136 AD2d 780, lv denied 71 NY2d 899; People v Gray, 131 AD2d 590).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 188 A.D.2d 738, 591 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 738 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
131 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Mackey
136 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)