People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gray

129 A.D.2d 813, 514 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 813 (People v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gray, 129 A.D.2d 813, 514 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered February 23, 1983, convicting him of arson in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, harassment, and aggravated harassment in the second degree (three counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Trial Judge was not impartial and, thus, deprived him of a fair trial is not preserved for this court’s review and does not warrant the exercise of this court’s interest of justice jurisdiction.

[814]*814In any event, viewing the record as a whole, it is clear that the Trial Judge tried this case in an unbiased and impartial manner. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered February 23, 1983, convicting him of arson in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, harassment, and aggravated harassment in the second degree (three counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Trial Judge was not impartial and, thus, deprived him of a fair trial is not preserved for this court’s review and does not warrant the exercise of this court’s interest of justice jurisdiction.

[814]*814In any event, viewing the record as a whole, it is clear that the Trial Judge tried this case in an unbiased and impartial manner. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 813, 514 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gray-nyappdiv-1987.