People v. Talmage

6 Cal. 256, 1856 Cal. LEXIS 119
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 256 (People v. Talmage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Talmage, 6 Cal. 256, 1856 Cal. LEXIS 119 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

Admitting the right of Carothers to intervene in this case, his petition must be treated as a declaration or complaint under the statute, and as such is wholly insufficient. The facts set forth therein would be insufficient to constitute a cause of action either in law or equity; and the report of the referee, admitting all that it contains, shows conclusively upon its face, that the intervener has no legal claim against the State, and was not entitled to judgment.

We know of no law which would warrant the Governor or Attorney General in making such a contract; in fact, they possessed no such power. If entered into in good faith, it might be the subject for relief at the hands of the Legislature, but is certainly not a cause of legal action.

In absence of any statute to that effect, the State cannot be sued, and the judgment against her is erroneous. Upon the merits of the judgment, we forbear the expression of any opinion.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worthington v. State
598 P.2d 796 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1979)
Thatcher v. City of St. Louis
122 S.W.2d 915 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.
202 P. 133 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Raudabaugh v. State
96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 513 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1917)
Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings Society
125 N.W. 676 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Young v. State
54 P. 36 (Washington Supreme Court, 1898)
Vincent v. Lincoln Co.
30 F. 749 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1887)
State ex rel. Hart v. Burke
33 La. Ann. 498 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1881)
Sheldon v. Gunn
56 Cal. 582 (California Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 256, 1856 Cal. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-talmage-cal-1856.