People v. Talibon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Talibon

167 A.D.2d 437, 562 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 437 (People v. Talibon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Talibon, 167 A.D.2d 437, 562 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), rendered October 21, 1985, convicting him of assault in the the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It was not error for the court to admit into evidence testimony regarding the defendant’s use of an alias. The probative value of such evidence outweighed its possible prejudicial effect (see, People v Allweiss, 48 NY2d 40; People v Kay, 120 AD2d 615).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review them in the exer[438]*438cise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), rendered October 21, 1985, convicting him of assault in the the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It was not error for the court to admit into evidence testimony regarding the defendant’s use of an alias. The probative value of such evidence outweighed its possible prejudicial effect (see, People v Allweiss, 48 NY2d 40; People v Kay, 120 AD2d 615).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review them in the exer[438]*438cise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 437, 562 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-talibon-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack