People v. Kay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kay

119 A.D.2d 834, 501 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 834 (People v. Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kay, 119 A.D.2d 834, 501 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered December 3, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

By not moving to withdraw his guilty plea in the court of first instance, the defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review any issue of law as to the alleged insufficiency in the plea allocution (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636).

By his guilty plea, the defendant effectively waived any claim that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30 (see, People v Thill, 52 NY2d 1020; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845; People v Walker, 109 AD2d 858). Furthermore, it does not appear that the court erred in rejecting the defendant’s constitutionally based speedy-trial claim (People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered December 3, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

By not moving to withdraw his guilty plea in the court of first instance, the defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review any issue of law as to the alleged insufficiency in the plea allocution (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636).

By his guilty plea, the defendant effectively waived any claim that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30 (see, People v Thill, 52 NY2d 1020; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845; People v Walker, 109 AD2d 858). Furthermore, it does not appear that the court erred in rejecting the defendant’s constitutionally based speedy-trial claim (People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 834, 501 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kay-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack