People v. Sulsona
This text of 134 A.D.3d 861 (People v. Sulsona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered December 4, 2013, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). The record does not demonstrate that the defendant “grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he was forgoing” (People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; see People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]).
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in *862 sentencing him as a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316 [2004]; People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 54-57 [2000]; People v Delston, 30 AD3d 536 [2006]; People v Smalls, 293 AD2d 500, 501 [2002]; see also People v Walton, 101 AD3d 1489, 1490 [2012]), and, in any event, without merit (see CPL 400.21; People v Ladson, 30 AD3d 836, 837 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.3d 861, 19 N.Y.S.3d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sulsona-nyappdiv-2015.