People v. Smalls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Smalls

291 A.D.2d 223, 736 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 223 (People v. Smalls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Smalls, 291 A.D.2d 223, 736 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered April 6, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the court’s jury instructions on the concepts of reasonable doubt and accomplice liability are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that each of these instructions, read as a whole, conveyed the proper principles of law (see, People v Fields, 87 NY2d 821). Concur— Williams, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered April 6, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the court’s jury instructions on the concepts of reasonable doubt and accomplice liability are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that each of these instructions, read as a whole, conveyed the proper principles of law (see, People v Fields, 87 NY2d 821). Concur— Williams, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 223, 736 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smalls-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack