People v. Stewart

500 N.W.2d 756, 199 Mich. App. 199
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 1993·No. Docket 129343·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

[200]*200Michael J. Kelly, J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520d; MSA 28.788(4), and was sentenced thereafter to five to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He now appeals as of right. We affirm.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial. People v Gonzales, 193 Mich App 263, 265-267; 483 NW2d 458 (1992). Defendant was offered the opportunity to have any error arising out of the testimony of the arresting officer cured by an instruction to the jury. Defendant did not take advantage of this offer. Further, any error that occurred when the officer made an innocuous reference to another criminal act was not so prejudicial as to deny defendant a fair trial or to amount to a miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed.

Wahls, P.J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stewart, 500 N.W.2d 756, 199 Mich. App. 199 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993).

500 N.W.2d 756 (People v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People of Michigan v. Kasheen Calein Kellis
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2025
People of Michigan v. David Lee Farris
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
People v. Stewart
500 N.W.2d 756 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1993)