People v. Spencer
This text of 279 A.D.2d 539 (People v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the de[540]*540fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), rendered March 22, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Calabrese, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement to law enforcement authorities.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his refusal to sign a document acknowledging that he had waived his Miranda rights (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436) demonstrated that his statement to the police was involuntary. This contention is without merit (see, North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369; People v Davis, 55 NY2d 731; People v Rivas, 175 AD2d 186; People v Ridge-way, 101 AD2d 555, affd 64 NY2d 952).
The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review, not properly before this Court, or without merit (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v Fontana, 267 AD2d 398; People v Valez, 256 AD2d 135). Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D.2d 539, 718 N.Y.S.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spencer-nyappdiv-2001.