People v. Hanna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hanna

185 A.D.2d 482, 586 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8934

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 16, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 185 A.D.2d 482 (People v. Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hanna, 185 A.D.2d 482, 586 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Mogavero, Jr., J.), rendered August 12, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant’s motion to suppress statements made by him to the arresting police officer was properly denied. The police officer’s questioning of defendant at the place where defendant’s vehicle had been stopped for a traffic violation about whether he had been drinking and driving was clearly investigatory rather than custodial interrogation (see, People v Mathis, 136 AD2d 746, lv denied 71 NY2d 899; People v Hennigan, 135 AD2d 1082; People v Brown, 104 AD2d 696). As to defendant’s remaining contentions, they have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Mogavero, Jr., J.), rendered August 12, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant’s motion to suppress statements made by him to the arresting police officer was properly denied. The police officer’s questioning of defendant at the place where defendant’s vehicle had been stopped for a traffic violation about whether he had been drinking and driving was clearly investigatory rather than custodial interrogation (see, People v Mathis, 136 AD2d 746, lv denied 71 NY2d 899; People v Hennigan, 135 AD2d 1082; People v Brown, 104 AD2d 696). As to defendant’s remaining contentions, they have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 482, 586 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hanna-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack