People v. Southard
158 A.D.2d 490
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s claim that he was not afforded the effective assistance of counsel is based on matters dehors the record and thus not reviewable on direct appeal (see, People v Walker, 152 AD2d 644; People v Bosley, 149 AD2d 520; People v Robinson, 122 AD2d 173). The appropriate remedy is a post-conviction motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Walker, supra; People v Bosley, supra). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Southard, 158 A.D.2d 490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 490 (People v. Southard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bartlett
215 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Lekhram
209 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Paganini
162 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)