People v. Bosley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bosley

149 A.D.2d 520, 540 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 149 A.D.2d 520 (People v. Bosley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bosley, 149 A.D.2d 520, 540 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), rendered April 29, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is based primarily on matters which are dehors the record and, thus, are not reviewable on direct appeal. Insofar as we are able to review his claim, we find that the defendant received effective assistance of counsel. The remainder of his present claim may be addressed in a postconviction proceeding pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Candelaria, 139 AD2d 752).

We note that the defendant received the sentence he was promised when he pleaded guilty (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), rendered April 29, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is based primarily on matters which are dehors the record and, thus, are not reviewable on direct appeal. Insofar as we are able to review his claim, we find that the defendant received effective assistance of counsel. The remainder of his present claim may be addressed in a postconviction proceeding pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Candelaria, 139 AD2d 752).

We note that the defendant received the sentence he was promised when he pleaded guilty (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A.D.2d 520, 540 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bosley-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack