People v. Soto

2017 NY Slip Op 8289, 155 A.D.3d 979, 63 N.Y.S.3d 896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2017·No. 2015-07966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Melendez, J.), imposed July 31, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 2017 NY Slip Op 8289, 155 A.D.3d 979, 63 N.Y.S.3d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 8289 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Venture
2018 NY Slip Op 8157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)