People v. Soberanis

228 A.D.2d 625, 644 N.Y.2d 639, 644 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7077
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 17, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 625 (People v. Soberanis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Soberanis, 228 A.D.2d 625, 644 N.Y.2d 639, 644 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying the defendant’s request, made after jury deliberations had commenced, to redact information from an exhibit introduced into evidence by defense counsel and shown to the jury by him during cross-examination of one of the People’s witnesses (cf., Feldsberg v Nitschke, 49 NY2d 636, 643).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Soberanis
264 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 625, 644 N.Y.2d 639, 644 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-soberanis-nyappdiv-1996.