People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Smith

79 A.D.2d 1035, 437 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9959

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 1035 (People v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Smith, 79 A.D.2d 1035, 437 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 8, 1978, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Motion by defendant’s assigned counsel for leave to withdraw as counsel. Judgment affirmed. Motion granted. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 [1036]*1036US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 8, 1978, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Motion by defendant’s assigned counsel for leave to withdraw as counsel. Judgment affirmed. Motion granted. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 [1036]*1036US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 1035, 437 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smith-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack