Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Washington

People v. Washington

372 N.E.2d 795, 43 N.Y.2d 772, 401 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2560
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by60 cases

This text of 372 N.E.2d 795 (People v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Washington, 372 N.E.2d 795, 43 N.Y.2d 772, 401 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2560 (N.Y. 1977).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order reversed, and the indictment dismissed. The seven-month delay between defendant’s felony indictment and his arrest constitutes a denial of the statutory right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.30, subd 1, par [a]).

The People contend that the delay was caused by "exceptional circumstances”, and hence falls within a statutory exception (CPL 30.30, subd 4, par [g]). They urge as an excuse an ongoing narcotics investigation. However, the proof of such investigation was deficient. No activity of any significance was [774]*774shown, but only a variety of unsatisfactory excuses why the investigation did not proceed. Statutory examples of exceptional circumstances would entail at least probable availability of new evidence within a reasonable period of time, and a justified need for additional time to prepare the People’s case. The statutory exception, then, if it is to be given reasonable effect and it is to fulfill the legislative purpose, must be limited to instances in which the prosecution’s inability to proceed is justified by the purposes of the investigation and credible, vigorous activity in pursuing it.

Since the indictment must be dismissed, it is unnecessary to determine whether the court’s erroneous characterization of a defense witness, in a supplementary charge, as "an admitted interested party”, would otherwise require a new trial.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Beason
2025 NY Slip Op 05598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Cruz (Raphael)
183 N.Y.S.3d 680 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Friday
2018 NY Slip Op 2367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Ricart
2017 NY Slip Op 5922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Rahoman
54 Misc. 3d 353 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2016)
The People v. Nnamdi Clarke
63 N.E.3d 1144 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People v. Cox
139 A.D.3d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Gonzalez
136 A.D.3d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Hashim
48 Misc. 3d 532 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2015)
People v. Silverstri
48 Misc. 3d 810 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2015)
People v. Clarke
122 A.D.3d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Ocasio
39 Misc. 3d 465 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
People v. Rahim
91 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Chardon
83 A.D.3d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Price
923 N.E.2d 1107 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Price
61 A.D.3d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Spector
189 Misc. 2d 224 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Zimny
188 Misc. 2d 600 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
People v. Spector
181 Misc. 2d 522 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1999)
People v. Salazar
180 Misc. 2d 128 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 N.E.2d 795, 43 N.Y.2d 772, 401 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-washington-ny-1977.