People v. Smith

33 A.D.2d 688, 306 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2919
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 24, 1969, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and ease remitted to the County Court for the purposes of hearing defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and determining the motion de novo. The findings of fact below have not been considered. The denial of the motion to withdraw the guilty plea was peremptory. Before denying the motion, the learned Trial Judge should have afforded defendant an opportunity to confer with counsel or should have inquired as to the purpose and motivation of defendant in making the application (People v. Klein, 26 A D 2d 559; People v. Borges, 28 A D 2d 735). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Smith, 33 A.D.2d 688, 306 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 688 (People v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Carter
144 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)