People v. Smith
194 N.W.2d 379, 37 Mich. App. 299
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Mich. App. 198 →
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was tried and convicted of having unlawful and carnal knowledge of a female under the age of 16 years and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.
Upon an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Smith, 194 N.W.2d 379, 37 Mich. App. 299 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
194 N.W.2d 379 (People v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.