People v. Smith

171 N.W.2d 15, 18 Mich. App. 320, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1067
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Mich. App. 198
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 1969·No. Docket No. 5,216·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Jerry Smith, was tried by a jury and convicted of assault with intent to commit rape contrary to MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Eev § 28.280). On appeal he contends that certain comments of the prosecutor during rebuttal argument to the jury were so inflammatory as to deprive him of a fair trial. The appellee has filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

The comments complained of were brought to the attention of the trial court, who held that they were proper arguments. Our examination of the brief of defendant, the motion to affirm and the record convinces us that the lower court was correct and that defendant did have , a fair and impartial trial. The question presented here on appeal is unsubstantial and requires no formal argument or submission.

The motion to affirm the defendant’s conviction is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Smith, 171 N.W.2d 15, 18 Mich. App. 320, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1067 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

171 N.W.2d 15 (People v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 750.85
Michigan § 750.85