People v. Slater
This text of 110 N.E.2d 503 (People v. Slater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and necessarily passed upon, as follows: Both appellants contended that the statutes under which they were convicted (Social Welfare Law, §§ 371, 374, 389; Penal Law, § 487-a) are invalid in that they violate on their face, and as construed and as applied by the trial court, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that the statutes aforesaid do not violate the due process clause aforesaid. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fttld and Froessel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 N.E.2d 503, 304 N.Y. 896, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-slater-ny-1953.