People v. Sims

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sims

45 A.D.2d 747, 356 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4724

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 747 (People v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sims, 45 A.D.2d 747, 356 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 3, 1972, convicting him of arson in the first degree and five counts of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The material points advanced by appellant and urged by his counsel do not constitute grounds for reversal as a matter of law because there were no timely protests of error, taken by objections or exceptions, as to the proof admitted, or as to the trial court’s failure to charge on the effect of a delayed arraignment (CPL 470.05, subd. 2). The ease, therefore, comes down to the question whether this court should reverse in the interests of justice (see People v. Farruggia, 41 A D 2d 894, 895). On this record we decline to do so. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Cohalan and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 3, 1972, convicting him of arson in the first degree and five counts of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The material points advanced by appellant and urged by his counsel do not constitute grounds for reversal as a matter of law because there were no timely protests of error, taken by objections or exceptions, as to the proof admitted, or as to the trial court’s failure to charge on the effect of a delayed arraignment (CPL 470.05, subd. 2). The ease, therefore, comes down to the question whether this court should reverse in the interests of justice (see People v. Farruggia, 41 A D 2d 894, 895). On this record we decline to do so. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Cohalan and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 747, 356 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sims-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack