People v. Rodriquez

76 A.D.2d 937, 432 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12046

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 30, 1976, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Defendant, in raising the defense of agency for the first time on appeal, has waived appellate review of this issue as a matter of law (see CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v Darrisaw, 49 NY2d 786). We find nothing in the record before us warranting our review as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15, subd 5; People v Sims, 45 AD2d 747, affd 37 NY2d 906). We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriquez, 76 A.D.2d 937, 432 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

76 A.D.2d 937 (People v. Rodriquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sims
340 N.E.2d 743 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Darrisaw
403 N.E.2d 450 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Sims
45 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)