People v. Sierra

126 A.D.3d 1513, 4 N.Y.S.3d 565
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sierra. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D.3d 460

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), rendered September 15, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated driving while intoxicated, a class D felony.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

[1514]*1514Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of felony aggravated driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [2-a] [a]; 1193 [1] [c] [ii]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly sentenced him pursuant to Penal Law § 60.21 to a five-year period of probation to run consecutively to his indeterminate term of imprisonment (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 [1] [c] [iii]; People v Segatol-Islami, 121 AD3d 1575, 1577 [2014]; People v O’Brien, 111 AD3d 1028, 1029 [2013]). “Inasmuch as the plain language of the statutes requires a sentencing court to impose a period of probation or conditional discharge in addition to any fine or term of imprisonment for convictions pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192, the Legislature clearly intended this type of cumulative sentence for felony driving while intoxicated convictions” (People v Brainard, 111 AD3d 1162, 1164 [2013]).

Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sierra, 126 A.D.3d 1513, 4 N.Y.S.3d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

126 A.D.3d 1513 (People v. Sierra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brainard
111 A.D.3d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Segatol-Islami
121 A.D.3d 1575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)