People v. Shih-Siang Shawn Liao
This text of 103 A.D.3d 757 (People v. Shih-Siang Shawn Liao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), imposed March 1, 2010, on the grounds, inter alia, that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
[758]*758The defendant’s contention that he was denied due process because the Supreme Court failed to hold a hearing to determine whether he violated a term of his plea agreement before sentencing him to an enhanced term of imprisonment is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bragg, 96 AD3d 1071 [2012]; People v Arrington, 94 AD3d 903 [2012]; People v Timberlake, 82 AD3d 1134, 1135 [2011]). In any event, since the defendant did not dispute that he violated the plea agreement by failing to return to court on the original sentencing date of June 30, 2009, no hearing was required (see People v Valencia, 3 NY3d 714, 715-716 [2004]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A.D.3d 757, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shih-siang-shawn-liao-nyappdiv-2013.