People v. Ferzan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ferzan

133 A.D.3d 683, 18 N.Y.S.3d 885

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2015·No. 2014-02401·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered February 24, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in failing to conduct a hearing to determine whether he violated the terms of a cooperation agreement is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Smith, 105 AD3d 1065, 1066 [2013]; People v Shih-Siang Shawn Liao, 103 AD3d 757, 758 [2013]; People v Bragg, 96 AD3d 1071 [2012]). In any event, since the defendant admitted that he failed to pay restitution, in violation of the cooperation agreement, no hearing was required (see People v Smith, 105 AD3d at 1066; People v Shih-Siang Shawn Liao, 103 AD3d at 758; People v Billups, *684 63 AD3d 750 [2009]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered February 24, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in failing to conduct a hearing to determine whether he violated the terms of a cooperation agreement is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Smith, 105 AD3d 1065, 1066 [2013]; People v Shih-Siang Shawn Liao, 103 AD3d 757, 758 [2013]; People v Bragg, 96 AD3d 1071 [2012]). In any event, since the defendant admitted that he failed to pay restitution, in violation of the cooperation agreement, no hearing was required (see People v Smith, 105 AD3d at 1066; People v Shih-Siang Shawn Liao, 103 AD3d at 758; People v Billups, *684 63 AD3d 750 [2009]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

People v. Ferzan, 133 A.D.3d 683, 18 N.Y.S.3d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

133 A.D.3d 683 (People v. Ferzan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related