People v. Sharpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sharpe

98 A.D.3d 633, 949 N.Y.S.2d 650

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 15, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the [634]*634County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed April 1, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant failed to establish extraordinary circumstances that would warrant disturbing the sentence imposed (see People v Pedraza, 66 NY2d 626 [1985]; People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306 [1981]; People v Bussey, 67 AD3d 819 [2009]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the [634]*634County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed April 1, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant failed to establish extraordinary circumstances that would warrant disturbing the sentence imposed (see People v Pedraza, 66 NY2d 626 [1985]; People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306 [1981]; People v Bussey, 67 AD3d 819 [2009]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

People v. Sharpe, 98 A.D.3d 633, 949 N.Y.S.2d 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

98 A.D.3d 633 (People v. Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related