People v. Bussey
This text of 67 A.D.3d 819 (People v. Bussey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the [820]*820defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Guidice, J.), rendered December 8, 2008, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, after a nonjury trial and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to establish extraordinary circumstances that would warrant disturbing the sentence imposed (see People v Pedraza, 66 NY2d 626, 627 [1985]; People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306 [1981]; People v Masters, 36 AD3d 959, 960 [2007]; People v Torres, 150 AD2d 406 [1989]). Further, in light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history, which includes numerous felony convictions for robbery, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the instant offense, the sentencing of the defendant, as a second felony offender, to the maximum sentence was not excessive (see Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [d]; [4] [b]; § 160.05; People v Toney, 12 AD3d 623 [2004]; People v Rychel, 284 AD2d 662 [2001]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 84 [1982]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.D.3d 819, 887 N.Y.S.2d 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bussey-nyappdiv-2009.