People v. Shahumyan

5 A.D.3d 612, 772 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2729

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered October 24, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the sentencing court [613]*613improperly considered charges of which he was acquitted as a basis for imposing sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Emmanus, 300 AD2d 504 [2002]), and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Emmanus, supra; People v Robinson, 250 AD2d 629 [1998]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Shahumyan, 5 A.D.3d 612, 772 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 612 (People v. Shahumyan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Robinson
250 A.D.2d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Emmanus
300 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)