People v. Emmanus
This text of 300 A.D.2d 504 (People v. Emmanus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered May 4, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the sentencing court improperly considered charges of which he was acquitted as a [505]*505basis for imposing sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Robinson, 250 AD2d 629; see also People v Hall, 46 NY2d 873, 875, cert denied 444 US 848).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 A.D.2d 504, 750 N.Y.S.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-emmanus-nyappdiv-2002.