People v. Sexton
This text of 50 A.D.2d 842 (People v. Sexton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 7, 1975, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified as to the conviction, on the law and the facts, by reducing it to one of criminal facilitation in the first degree; as so modified, judgment affirmed as to the conviction; judgment reversed as to the sentence and case remanded to Criminal Term for resentence. In our opinion, the evidence was legally insufficient to establish defendant’s guilt of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. However, the proof adduced at trial was sufficient to establish his guilt of criminal facilitation in the first degree (Penal Law, § 115.05). Accordingly, we have modified the judgment by reducing the conviction to one of criminal facilitation in the first degree and have remanded the case to the trial court for resentence. Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Christ, Brennan and Hunder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 842, 376 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sexton-nyappdiv-1975.