People v. Searcy
747 N.W.2d 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Searcy. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 1112 →
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lavelle Wesley SEARCY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED as moot.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Searcy, 747 N.W.2d 287 (Mich. 2008).
747 N.W.2d 287 (People v. Searcy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Conway
716 N.W.2d 554 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)