People v. Searcy
753 N.W.2d 162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Searcy. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 1112 →
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lavelle Wesley SEARCY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's April 28, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
*163 MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Searcy, 753 N.W.2d 162 (Mich. 2008).
753 N.W.2d 162 (People v. Searcy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Conway
716 N.W.2d 554 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)