People v. Sceravino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sceravino

57 A.D.3d 503, 867 N.Y.2d 696

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A.D.3d 503 (People v. Sceravino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sceravino, 57 A.D.3d 503, 867 N.Y.2d 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record contains nothing to warrant the conclusion that he was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, which resulted in his consenting to a level two sex offender designation (see generally People v Carey, 47 AD3d 1079 [2008]; see also People v Costas, 46 AD3d 475 [2007]). Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record contains nothing to warrant the conclusion that he was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, which resulted in his consenting to a level two sex offender designation (see generally People v Carey, 47 AD3d 1079 [2008]; see also People v Costas, 46 AD3d 475 [2007]). Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.3d 503, 867 N.Y.2d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sceravino-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack