Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Kinlock

People v. Kinlock

58 A.D.3d 869, 870 N.Y.S.2d 918
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.3d 869 (People v. Kinlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kinlock, 58 A.D.3d 869, 870 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered April 27, 2006, convicting him of rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[870]*870We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Spolzino, J.E, Santucci, Miller, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 A.D.3d 869, 870 N.Y.S.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kinlock-nyappdiv-2009.