People v. Santos
91 A.D.3d 974, 937 N.Y.2d 631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santos. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 A.D.3d 899 →
Opinion
[975]*975The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez-Bautista, 89 AD3d 749 [2011]; People v Gantt, 85 AD3d 815, 816 [2011]). In any event, his plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]). Angiolillo, J.P, Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santos, 91 A.D.3d 974, 937 N.Y.2d 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
91 A.D.3d 974 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Fiumefreddo
626 N.E.2d 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Gantt
85 A.D.3d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Hernandez-Bautista
89 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)