People v. Santos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Santos

91 A.D.3d 974, 937 N.Y.2d 631

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 974 (People v. Santos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Santos, 91 A.D.3d 974, 937 N.Y.2d 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

[975]*975The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez-Bautista, 89 AD3d 749 [2011]; People v Gantt, 85 AD3d 815, 816 [2011]). In any event, his plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]). Angiolillo, J.P, Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[975]*975The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez-Bautista, 89 AD3d 749 [2011]; People v Gantt, 85 AD3d 815, 816 [2011]). In any event, his plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]). Angiolillo, J.P, Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.3d 974, 937 N.Y.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-santos-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack