People v. Santos

255 A.D.2d 238, 679 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12427
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santos. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 A.D.2d 651

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered November 13, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the undercover officer should not have been allowed to testify anonymously was not preserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the ruling was properly grounded upon concerns for the officer’s safety and that defendant has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced thereby (People v [239]*239Washington, 227 AD2d 126, 127, lv denied 88 NY2d 996; People v Kearse, 215 AD2d 104, lv denied 86 NY2d 797). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santos, 255 A.D.2d 238, 679 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 238 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kearse
215 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Washington
227 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)