People v. Santos

243 A.D.2d 276, 662 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9344
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered December 20, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years, 5 to 10 years, 2V2 to 5 years and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously afiirmed.

Statements by the victim were properly admitted as prompt outcries since they were made at the first suitable opportunity and because only the fact of a complaint was elicited (see, People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10). Moreover, the seriatim outcries to two different listeners were admissible since they were both prompt under the circumstances (see, People v Fabian, 213 AD2d 298, lv denied 85 NY2d 972). We do not perceive any abuse of sentencing discretion. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santos, 243 A.D.2d 276, 662 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 276 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Morales
34 A.D.3d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)