People v. Santiago
101 A.D.3d 1155, 955 N.Y.2d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 26, 2012·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]).
However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]). Moreover, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santiago, 101 A.D.3d 1155, 955 N.Y.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
101 A.D.3d 1155 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lormil
2017 NY Slip Op 3194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Barrett
105 A.D.3d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)