People v. Santiago
101 A.D.3d 441, 954 N.Y.2d 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 1471 →
Opinion
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s rejection of defendant’s explanation of his reason for forcefully throwing his dog to the floor, causing injury. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Richter, Román and Clark, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santiago, 101 A.D.3d 441, 954 N.Y.2d 453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
101 A.D.3d 441 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)