People v. Santiago
97 A.D.3d 707, 947 N.Y.2d 890
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
As conceded by the defendant, she failed to preserve for appellate review her contentions that Leandra’s Law (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1198, 1193) is unconstitutional (see People v Farrelly, 92 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2012]; People v Lashley, 58 AD3d 753, 754 [2009]). The defendant’s remaining contention is also unpreserved for appellate review. We decline to review the defendant’s contentions in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santiago, 97 A.D.3d 707, 947 N.Y.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 707 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hope
2021 NY Slip Op 01787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)