People v. Sanders

163 A.D.2d 852, 559 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9536
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of burglary in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 140.25) was supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Defendant’s claim that he had a license or privilege to be in complainant’s apartment is without merit. There was no evidence that defendant had permission to be in complainant’s apartment at the time the crime was committed. Further, we find that defendant’s counsel, although inexperienced, provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flynn, J.— burglary, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanders, 163 A.D.2d 852, 559 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 852 (People v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jackson
269 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)