People v. Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanders

146 A.D.2d 653, 536 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 A.D.2d 653 (People v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanders, 146 A.D.2d 653, 536 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered December 9, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the defendant’s motion is granted, the guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The Supreme Court should have permitted the defendant to withdraw his plea since it could not honor its promise regarding the sentence due to the defendant’s status as a second violent felony offender (see, People v Catalano, 113 AD2d 896; People v Powell, 105 AD2d 761; People v Rogers, 82 AD2d 731, affd 56 NY2d 552). Mangano, J. R, Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered December 9, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the defendant’s motion is granted, the guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The Supreme Court should have permitted the defendant to withdraw his plea since it could not honor its promise regarding the sentence due to the defendant’s status as a second violent felony offender (see, People v Catalano, 113 AD2d 896; People v Powell, 105 AD2d 761; People v Rogers, 82 AD2d 731, affd 56 NY2d 552). Mangano, J. R, Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.D.2d 653, 536 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanders-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack