People v. Saddler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Saddler

198 A.D.2d 919, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1005

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1993

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 919 (People v. Saddler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Saddler, 198 A.D.2d 919, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s sentence was not harsh or excessive. Defendant may raise his alleged inability to pay the restitution ordered by the court in an application for resentencing pursuant to CPL 420.10 (5) (see, People v Erickson, 172 AD2d 1070). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Punch, J.— Violation of Probation.) Present — Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s sentence was not harsh or excessive. Defendant may raise his alleged inability to pay the restitution ordered by the court in an application for resentencing pursuant to CPL 420.10 (5) (see, People v Erickson, 172 AD2d 1070). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Punch, J.— Violation of Probation.) Present — Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 919, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-saddler-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack