People v. Erickson
172 A.D.2d 1070, 571 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6376
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. Defendant’s alleged inability to pay the restitution imposed by the court may be raised by him in an application made to the sentencing court for resentencing pursuant to CPL 420.10 (5). (Appeal from Judgment of [1071]*1071Steuben County Court, Harvey, J.—Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Erickson, 172 A.D.2d 1070, 571 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
172 A.D.2d 1070 (People v. Erickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Saddler
198 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)