People v. Ruiz
289 A.D.2d 1083, 735 N.Y.S.2d 464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ruiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 A.D.3d 831 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2001·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). “Viewed as a whole, * * * defense counsel’s efforts reflect ‘a reasonable and legitimate strategy under the circumstances and evidence presented’ ” (People v Tonge, 93 NY2d 838, 840). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ruiz, 289 A.D.2d 1083, 735 N.Y.S.2d 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
289 A.D.2d 1083 (People v. Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Tonge
710 N.E.2d 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)