People v. Ruiz
This text of 266 A.D.2d 319 (People v. Ruiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defen[320]*320dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered October 6, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the court erred in allowing into evidence money that was recovered from his person at the time of his arrest is without merit. The evidence was probative of the defendant’s intent to sell the narcotics in question (see, People v Jones, 138 AD2d 405; People v Mayas, 137 AD2d 836).
The defendant also argues that the court erred in permitting the prosecutor to elicit evidence regarding prior narcotics-related activity in the area of the defendant’s arrest. Assuming that the court erred in that respect, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, S. Miller and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D.2d 319, 698 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ruiz-nyappdiv-1999.