People v. Rucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rucker

117 A.D.2d 827, 499 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53103

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.2d 827 (People v. Rucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rucker, 117 A.D.2d 827, 499 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), both rendered April 8, 1980, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree under indictment No. 8083/78, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 8084/78, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), both rendered April 8, 1980, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree under indictment No. 8083/78, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 8084/78, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 827, 499 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rucker-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack