People v. Rucker

92 A.D.2d 750, 461 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17080
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 A.D.2d 948

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a conviction of robbery in the second degree and larceny in the third degree after a jury trial in which he and a codefendant were jointly represented. The codefendant’s conviction was previously reversed because no inquiry was made of him as to whether he was aware of the risk inherent in joint representation (People v Ellis, 80 AD2d 750). The District Attorney has candidly conceded that defendant is entitled to the same relief. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boomer, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rucker, 92 A.D.2d 750, 461 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

92 A.D.2d 750 (People v. Rucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ellis
80 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)