People v. Roy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roy

245 A.D.2d 878, 667 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13607

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1997·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered February 14, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of manslaughter in the second degree and, after he was denied adjudication as a youthful offender, was sentenced in accordance with a negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of 5 to 15 years. Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, we do not find that County Court improvidently exercised its discretion by denying him youthful offender status in view of the court’s consideration of the negative recommendation of the Probation Department and the serious nature of the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty (i.e., while under the influence of cocaine, defendant recklessly caused the death of an infant by throwing him up into the air) (see, People v Bonilla, 237 AD2d 672; People v Ortega, 114 AD2d 912, lv denied 67 NY2d 887; see also, CPL 720.20 [1]). Moreover, inasmuch as defendant received the benefit of his plea bargain, we find that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Shabazz, 242 AD2d 764).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered February 14, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of manslaughter in the second degree and, after he was denied adjudication as a youthful offender, was sentenced in accordance with a negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of 5 to 15 years. Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, we do not find that County Court improvidently exercised its discretion by denying him youthful offender status in view of the court’s consideration of the negative recommendation of the Probation Department and the serious nature of the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty (i.e., while under the influence of cocaine, defendant recklessly caused the death of an infant by throwing him up into the air) (see, People v Bonilla, 237 AD2d 672; People v Ortega, 114 AD2d 912, lv denied 67 NY2d 887; see also, CPL 720.20 [1]). Moreover, inasmuch as defendant received the benefit of his plea bargain, we find that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Shabazz, 242 AD2d 764).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Roy, 245 A.D.2d 878, 667 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

245 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related